Synthpop logo
ABOUTRESUPPLYRESOURCES

The requirements are written down. Proving you met them isn’t.

Synthpop turns the records already moving through your lab into accreditation-ready evidence, assembled as the work happens, with the reasoning shown and the gaps flagged before a surveyor finds them.

See it review a case

See the agent
prove it for yourself

Step 1Point Synthpop at your lab

Run a compliance scan

Grant the agent read access and it reviews every order against your frameworks — continuously, not just at audit time. Here's what comes back.

Metro Health Pathology Dept.
Sample lab · Ready to scan
From existing records to source-linked evidence.+ EMR / EHR+ LIS+ Reports
Pathology reports EMR/EHR LIS Accession log Sign-out register Shared drives
Reading —
Press “Run compliance scan” to begin.
PatientDateCode / controlSignature
Connecting…
0
records reviewed
Live · monitored
Compliance posture
Run the scan to see this lab's live compliance posture across CAP, CLIA, The Joint Commission and CMS.
Step 2Inside the gap

Judgment you can read, not a score to trust

Watch the agent read the record across your systems and check it against the control — the structured result fills in as it works, every line tied to the evidence behind it.

Order #4471 · Surgical pathology
Remote telepathology sign-out
Received Mar 3 · Pathologist sign-out pending
1 gap
!
3 of 4 requirements met · 1 gap to resolveThe agent won't sign off on a gap — it surfaces it for your team, with the evidence attached.
Synthpop agent
Reviewing Order #4471
0:00
Mapping the evidence graph…
3 / 4
requirements met
1 gap flagged
14 nodes · 5 systems checked
Step 3Proof you can export

Every review, captured with its evidence

The result isn't a number you hope was checked — it's a structured, evidence-linked record you can hand straight to a surveyor.

Surveyor — “prove the sign-out for case #4471”
synthpop
Audit trail · #AT-4471
Metro Health Pathology Dept.
Generated Mar 4, 2026
Documentation review — Order #4471
⚠ 1 gap to resolve3 of 4 requirements met · evidence attached
Record
Order
#4471 · Surgical pathology
Accession
SP-24-••812
Ordering MD
Dr. A. Nguyen · NPI ••••3210
Control
Telepathology sign-out
Frameworks
CAP · CLIA · Joint Commission
Turnaround
18h · within 48h target
Requirements & evidence✓ Evidence-linked
RequirementStatusEvidence source
Sample · synthetic data. No patient or lab data is used, requested, or stored.
+ email, photos & 6 more sources
✓ Audit-ready · export
Book a 20-min workflow audit →

Built for the whole cycle,
not just the checklist

Bring the evidence together

Pulled from the records you already generate, no new data entry. The proof scattered across your lab system, email, and shared drives, in one place.

Show its work

An auditable rationale and source for every requirement, gaps flagged. Missing evidence stays visible, and the decision stays with your team.

Stay ready between cycles

Live drift alerts, plus evidence you collect once and reuse across bodies. Reusable across AASM, CLIA, CAP, the Joint Commission, CMS, and DME.

TRUSTED BY

LabRetrieverTwilioParachuteHealthUCLAEpicCernerNikohealthBrighttreeHampton Homecare
LabRetrieverTwilioParachuteHealthUCLAEpicCernerNikohealthBrighttreeHampton Homecare

Proof you can export, not readiness you hope happened

Every review is captured with the evidence behind it — deployed inside your own Google Cloud environment, where your data stays under your control.

Source-linked evidence

Every requirement ties back to the record that supports it, so nothing rests on a checkbox.

An auditable rationale per case

The reasoning behind each answer, including what could not be verified, ready to defend to a surveyor.

A full audit trail

Call-level and case-level history across every requirement and cycle, exportable when the inspection comes.

Impact

Running on a platform
already in production

5xlower cost per referral
96%faster referral processing
100kpatients onboarded
91%digital-intake completion

Across one diagnostic lab operator serving 100+ health systems.

FAQs

Common
questions

Why is accreditation evidence so hard to keep current?

Because it is judgment, not data entry, and the evidence lives everywhere. QA that is supposed to be continuous often gets reconstructed in the weeks before an inspection, from memory and scattered files.

How does Synthpop gather and judge the evidence?

It reads the records already flowing through your operation, pulls what each requirement needs, and prepares a met or not-met answer with the reasoning and the source, for your team to review.

Does it work with our systems?

It is built to run where your infrastructure already lives and can begin with no IT integration, then connect to Epic, your LIS, and other sources as the work deepens.

What happens with judgment calls or missing evidence?

Missing evidence is flagged, not hidden, and the decision stays with your team. Synthpop shows its work; it does not overrule your reviewers.

Is it secure and compliant?

HIPAA-compliant, SOC 2-audited, with audit logging built in, running inside your own environment.

What do we actually get to show a surveyor?

Source-linked evidence for each requirement, the rationale behind each answer, and a full exportable audit trail.

Get in touch

Let's map your accreditation and reporting workflow

A working session with your compliance and lab teams. We map your requirements to the evidence you already generate, find where that evidence is scattered, quantify the manual reporting load, and align on the ROI of closing the gap.

An assessment started now reports before year end, in time to put remediation in your 2027 budget.

    * indicates required
    Company Size